3 ms·
Nuclear proliferation is considered an antipattern for a reason. It's not about fairness, it's about reducing the chances of an accidental nuclear war. Yes, one
by fsloth 4y ago
Nuclear proliferation is considered an antipattern for a reason. It's not about fairness, it's about reducing the chances of an accidental nuclear war. Yes, one factor is the power balance of incumbent nuclear states, but it does no invalidate the argument for avoiding proliferation.
- posterboy 4y ago> , one factor is the power balance of incumbent nuclear states, but [*they] does no invalidate the argument for avoiding proliferation. Fixed that for you