If you make a painting it is suppose to be viewed at a specific size. If you specifically create it to work at different sizes (like a logo) you suffer enormous

If you make a painting it is suppose to be viewed at a specific size. If you specifically create it to work at different sizes (like a logo) you suffer enormous constraints. I took a picture one time of a boat on the horizon under a beautiful sky with a few distant seagulls that, while small, were absolutely necessary for the composition. It looked stunning full screen, one could almost smell the ocean. When slightly scaled down the clouds turned uninteresting, the boat lost all detail, the waves and the gulls just vanished. One could certainly argue that there is no need for such things and that an interface can be (or should be?) equally usable on any kind of screen. To me it stops being art at that point. It reminds me of The Night watch, they "reflow" the painting by cutting parts of. People thought one can just do that. Or perhaps they showed it's not a problem, I dunno. It's not for me.