3 ms·
But now I am getting confused with the level of verbosity, the level of explicitly has led to implicit complexity. Enjoy the verbosity. It makes for excellent
by simonblack 4y ago
But now I am getting confused with the level of verbosity, the level of explicitly has led to implicit complexity.
Enjoy the verbosity. It makes for excellent maintenance down the track. There is no ambiguity about what is happening if you name your variables correctly. For what it's worth, I once wrote an 8080 disassembler in COBOL. That was 40-odd years ago. It's still maintainable because of its verbosity, though I doubt if I'd have the patience to do so these days.
- LangIsAllWeNeed 4y agoThat is impressive, the idea of dissembling cobol is beyond comprehension.....its syntax reads like someone shouting at the computer under duress. I'm not actually doing this, its joke. Sometimes the level of obscure projects and heated discussions for and against clean code on this site is funny to me. Hypothetically I suppose its possible in simple form because neural nets are pretty old. Maybe it should be done............ If so I will name my variables very well, my code will be so explicit and clean anyone can maintain it.