3 ms·
Let’s save our outrage for things that actually happen. But yes — I think many parents would be uncomfortable taking children to burlesque shows, rather than d
by zmgsabst 4y ago
Let’s save our outrage for things that actually happen.
But yes — I think many parents would be uncomfortable taking children to burlesque shows, rather than drag shows. And similarly uncomfortable with a heterosexual teacher who discussed their sexuality in the way that this prohibits.
We don’t teach young kids about sexuality or gender identity at a young age, regardless.
That’s not the job of school teachers.
- scarface74 4y agoThese same people would never object to a teacher talking about a “normal” heterosexual couple. They don’t just object to teachers talking about their sexuality. They object to admitting that gay people exists - ie a man saying “I went to the movies with my husband”.
- rbetts 4y agoYou are dramatically narrowing, in your description, what the law actually broadly prohibits. It isn't about burlesque shows or about a teacher discussing sex with a young student. The text of (this portion) of the law is: > Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards. It says very clearly that a instruction about gender identity MAY NOT OCCUR before grade 4 - and after that must occur in accordance with state standards and to a vague standard of "appropriateness".