Then you should get informed about what the law actually does — rather than incorrect hypotheticals. Let’s save outrage for what actually happens, not our fanta

Then you should get informed about what the law actually does — rather than incorrect hypotheticals. Let’s save outrage for what actually happens, not our fantasies. And yes — Disney publicly condemned a law protecting children from inappropriate conduct; ie, Disney publicly came out in favor of sexual discussions with children. That’s what led to consequences. - - - - - Your first example is about a teacher who was fired before this for reasons related to not following the curriculum. But it correctly describes this law: > Officially titled the Parental Rights in Education bill, the legislation bans teaching about sexual orientation or gender identity “in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.” What about that do you specifically object to?