4 ms·
This doesn't add up. CSS grid, flex box, etc all do the "holy grail" layout with a couple lines. The tables mess that was early www was and remains an absolute
by ozaark 4y ago
This doesn't add up. CSS grid, flex box, etc all do the "holy grail" layout with a couple lines. The tables mess that was early www was and remains an absolute mess of markdown to maintain for layout. Semantics and accessibility are practically out the window with table.
HCI dictates how humans use interfaces and with that comes many defacto reasons why a plain text page does not solve the problems users want to solve. Do you not think websites test into the optimal performing layouts and content distribution? If it worked better, we'd all be using it (it doesn't).
- Dalewyn 4y ago>Do you not think websites test into the optimal performing layouts and content distribution? No, I think most website devs left to their devices optimize for least effort to create and maintain.
- kerkeslager 4y ago> No, I think most website devs left to their devices optimize for least effort to create and maintain. ...which is definitely not tables. Flexbox is much easier.