3 ms·
It's also irrelevant, per the US Constitution, but it could be annoying for some period of time.
by jjtheblunt 4y ago
It's also irrelevant, per the US Constitution, but it could be annoying for some period of time.
- tomrod 4y agoShort-term existence still has real harm, despite long-term irrelevance. I don't consider that a reasonable stance.
- nathanaldensr 4y agoIt's certainly not; see New York passing law after law restricting gun rights after clear Supreme Court rulings. The new trend with state legislatures seems to be to zerg the federal courts with lawsuits while these laws remain in force.
- locopati 4y ago"well regulated"... that means it can, is even mandated, to be regulated. many people don't wish to live in a world of open carry, and minimal requirements to own and carry a gun. just because the current SCOTUS is an activist court willing to undermine legislatures doesn't make them right. Florida on the other hand is blatantly violating the 1st Amendment repeatedly.
- mcphage 4y agoIt’s also a waste of time and money, to be spent defending an obviously indefensible law.