>Ascribing agency to inanimate things is a return to the pre-scientific past and an abandonment of science. This is just so wrong. That these things are inani

>Ascribing agency to inanimate things is a return to the pre-scientific past and an abandonment of science. This is just so wrong. That these things are inanimate is not a scientific view it is an interpretation, period. People are allowed to interpret the world in other ways and most of the greatest scientific minds did not have this atheistic view. If you look you’ll find this is a relatively modern condescension. >I rather happen to like my antibiotics and weather prediction more than sacrifices to the gods. This is hyperbole at best. Irrelevant to the discussion.