6 ms·
Nice work. However I'd suggest you reduce the focus on search box (probably even remove it) . It's not working for most searches and is taking far too much atte
by sushi 15y ago
Nice work. However I'd suggest you reduce the focus on search box (probably even remove it) . It's not working for most searches and is taking far too much attention. I probably would have left the page, had I not scrolled down by chance.
You might also want to add new input attributes like number, date, time and search etc.
- nimbupani 15y agowhat search is not working? We are looking to add more features soon!
- sushi 15y agoI tried the input tag among others. On a second inspection, I just missed most of the results because they are below the fold.
- monsterix 15y agoDivya is this via boilerplate, huh?
- politician 15y agoIt didn't return results for "sessionStorage", but "localStorage" worked.
- SquareWheel 15y agoSearch worked fine for everything I tried. I will say that the "link to this search" button is where I would expect the "go" button to be, but it's a live search instead. A tad confusing.
- Edootjuh 15y agoI agree. A problem is that the search results are below the fold on a 800px high screen, and the text would be more descriptive if it said "type to search for features" or something like that, and not be selected on page load (in Chromium at least) Of course, besides that I think this is very helpful. Thank you very much for making this.