3 ms·
It's more than a meme, but documented by research. Some citations: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn2222 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn2222 > The key i
by est31 4y ago
It's more than a meme, but documented by research. Some citations:
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn2222 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn2222
> The key issue, then, is not that zoonotic diseases appear in humans, but that their emergence seems to be increasing in frequency (3). Major changes in land use, increasing urbanization, and global connectedness are well documented as driving disease emergence through increasing human–animal contacts and accelerating transmission rates, and climate change will similarly accelerate the rate of zoonotic events.
It's not a paper in itself but it says what I've been saying above way more eloquently. It also cites this paper:
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06536 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06536
> Here we analyse a database of 335 EID ‘events’ (origins of EIDs) between 1940 and 2004, and demonstrate non-random global patterns. EID events have risen significantly over time after controlling for reporting bias, with their peak incidence (in the 1980s) concomitant with the HIV pandemic. EID events are dominated by zoonoses (60.3% of EIDs): the majority of these (71.8%) originate in wildlife (for example, severe acute respiratory virus, Ebola virus), and are increasing significantly over time.
Lastly, some other recent research: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29378-2 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29378-2
- AbrahamParangi 4y agoI will stand by the meme characterization. The first links assumes Covid was zoonotic which is a fine assumption but not a high quality conclusion and the second link shows the trend peaking in the 80s and then decreasing. Since the world population was only 60% what it is today, that is strong evidence that at absolute minimum the relationship is nonlinear and perhaps inverts at higher population sizes (as wild biodiversity decreases). To be quite honest, citing research on a politically polarized topic is not as useful as it used to be. The political polarization within the academy means that there is a lot of pretty loose research that may get through if it has the appropriate orientation. In practice, you can almost always find (low quality) research supporting one’s position if the position is lefty.