3 ms·
Nor is it only incorrect one billionth of the time, as you seem to be indicating through your hypotheticals. Depending on what I've asked it about, it can be in
by mrtranscendence 4y ago
Nor is it only incorrect one billionth of the time, as you seem to be indicating through your hypotheticals. Depending on what I've asked it about, it can be incorrect at an extremely high rate.
- williamcotton 4y agoThat is definitely not what I am indicating. I'm pointing out the absurdity of speaking of probabilistic things in absolutes. Yes, ask an LLM to multiply a few numbers together and you will get around 100% failure rate. The same goes for quotes, citations, website addresses, and most numerical facts. The failures are predictable. That means the models can be augmented with external knowledge, Python or JS interpreters, etc.