5 ms·

https://sourcehut.org/pricing/ https://sourcehut.org/pricing/

dist1ll 4y ago
https://sourcehut.org/blog/2022-10-31-tos-update-cryptocurrency/ https://sourcehut.org/blog/2022-10-31-tos-update-cryptocurre...
- nibbleshifter 4y ago
  Yeah, I can't in good faith recommend sourcehut anymore given their policies.
  - turblety 4y ago
    Yeah, same. I could never use a service that will just arbitary ban any legal and legit project type, just because of the owners bias.
  - ajkjk 4y ago
    Oh, I kinda like it. They took a moral stance on something (good), explained it well (good) and made it easy to offboard (good).
kodah 4y ago
Personally I've read enough blog posts off that domain to not click that link. YMMV.
neilv 4y ago
How do people like sourcehut.org for open source projects? For startups? For established "enterprise"? I overall like GitLab for startups, especially since I can do my own flavor of Kanban with the scoped labels feature of their Premium account. So I'm leaning towards also moving my personal open source to gitlab.com, just to simplify. I would've already moved, but gitlab.com's CloudFlare setup is blocking my Firefox. And a couple times now GitLab has changed the pricing dramatically, and I won't like surprises like that after I've invested many hours to move there.
- mdaniel 4y ago
  The "we use email for pull requests, like Linux" is a "you've got to be kidding me" level facepalm
  - neilv 4y ago
    Now that I think of it, that's maybe not a terribly bad idea for some open source projects in which I want a little friction to submitting patches. (Because, for those projects, I actually dislike patches. It's usually more work for me to review for design and code quality than to make the changes myself, if they were good changes at all). And there's the mess when people are driven by email notifications for Git repo changes/events that they then access in a Web UI. It's great for wasting people's time, and people also end up with piles of Git repo emails that they casually archive/delete, potentially missing things, due to DRY violation and because there's more steps between looking at the email and going to the Web UI to handle things. But when you just want random people to be able to log into a Web site and interact with whatever computer-mediated workflow there, telling people to use old-school email is maybe counterproductive.
  - wrycoder 4y ago
    Seems like a great filter to me.

https://sourcehut.org/blog/2022-10-31-tos-update-cryptocurrency/ https://sourcehut.org/blog/2022-10-31-tos-update-cryptocurre...

nibbleshifter 4y ago
Yeah, I can't in good faith recommend sourcehut anymore given their policies.
- turblety 4y ago
  Yeah, same. I could never use a service that will just arbitary ban any legal and legit project type, just because of the owners bias.
- ajkjk 4y ago
  Oh, I kinda like it. They took a moral stance on something (good), explained it well (good) and made it easy to offboard (good).

kodah 4y ago

Personally I've read enough blog posts off that domain to not click that link. YMMV.

neilv 4y ago

How do people like sourcehut.org for open source projects? For startups? For established "enterprise"? I overall like GitLab for startups, especially since I can do my own flavor of Kanban with the scoped labels feature of their Premium account. So I'm leaning towards also moving my personal open source to gitlab.com, just to simplify. I would've already moved, but gitlab.com's CloudFlare setup is blocking my Firefox. And a couple times now GitLab has changed the pricing dramatically, and I won't like surprises like that after I've invested many hours to move there.

mdaniel 4y ago
The "we use email for pull requests, like Linux" is a "you've got to be kidding me" level facepalm
- neilv 4y ago
  Now that I think of it, that's maybe not a terribly bad idea for some open source projects in which I want a little friction to submitting patches. (Because, for those projects, I actually dislike patches. It's usually more work for me to review for design and code quality than to make the changes myself, if they were good changes at all). And there's the mess when people are driven by email notifications for Git repo changes/events that they then access in a Web UI. It's great for wasting people's time, and people also end up with piles of Git repo emails that they casually archive/delete, potentially missing things, due to DRY violation and because there's more steps between looking at the email and going to the Web UI to handle things. But when you just want random people to be able to log into a Web site and interact with whatever computer-mediated workflow there, telling people to use old-school email is maybe counterproductive.
- wrycoder 4y ago
  Seems like a great filter to me.