3 ms·

I would pay literally anyone else 10x that price per user just to not use Atlassian software.

by ok_dad 4y ago

xwowsersx 4y ago
Yep
llamaLord 4y ago
PM for Bitbucket pipelines here, my team of ~20 owns that feature E2W, would genuinely love to chat, share some stuff we're working on, and get feedback/thoughts. Ping me if you're open to chatting emunday@atlassian.com
- snickerbockers 4y ago
  >atlassian.com.com Is that an honest mistake or are you actually trying a phishing scam here?
  - llamaLord 4y ago
    Ahh f..k - phone keyboard, thank you, fixed now.
- plonk 4y ago
  I'm glad you're working on BB. We switched to GitHub a year ago and are happy with it, but with a slightly better UI and more reliable/advanced CI/CD features, I might not have been able to justify the switch.
- ZephyrBlu 4y ago
  I get the feeling this sentiment is not necessarily because BB sucks, but because people don't trust Atlassian. After the shit show last year with the week long outage and all the shit JIRA gets I don't think very highly of Atlassian as a company either.
- jfreax 4y ago
  No Datacenter edition (aka on-premise) disqualifies bb pipelines for a lot of premium/enterprise use-cases.
echelon 4y ago
Bitbucket used to fall over for monorepos. Sometimes it would fall into a death spiral, sometimes it would attribute PRs and commits to the wrong engineers (!!!) Not sure if that's still the case, but it was awful working with it. Don't even get me started on the dumpster fire that is Jira.
- llamaLord 4y ago
  We 100% have had issues with larger repo's in the past while we were still hosted on a stand-alone data centre. Since finishing our migration to AWS ~12 months ago, all stability and performance metrics are substantially improved. https://bitbucket.org/blog/bitbucket-cloud-has-landed-in-aws https://bitbucket.org/blog/bitbucket-cloud-has-landed-in-aws Full disclosure, we do still have some work to do in terms of supporting very large repo's (>10GB non-LFS) - but those scenarios are still handled relatively gracefully.

I would pay literally anyone else 10x that price per user just to not use Atlassian software.

by ok_dad 4y ago

I would pay literally anyone else 10x that price per user just to not use Atlassian software.

xwowsersx 4y ago

Yep

llamaLord 4y ago

PM for Bitbucket pipelines here, my team of ~20 owns that feature E2W, would genuinely love to chat, share some stuff we're working on, and get feedback/thoughts. Ping me if you're open to chatting emunday@atlassian.com

snickerbockers 4y ago
>atlassian.com.com Is that an honest mistake or are you actually trying a phishing scam here?
- llamaLord 4y ago
  Ahh f..k - phone keyboard, thank you, fixed now.
plonk 4y ago
I'm glad you're working on BB. We switched to GitHub a year ago and are happy with it, but with a slightly better UI and more reliable/advanced CI/CD features, I might not have been able to justify the switch.
ZephyrBlu 4y ago
I get the feeling this sentiment is not necessarily because BB sucks, but because people don't trust Atlassian. After the shit show last year with the week long outage and all the shit JIRA gets I don't think very highly of Atlassian as a company either.
jfreax 4y ago
No Datacenter edition (aka on-premise) disqualifies bb pipelines for a lot of premium/enterprise use-cases.

echelon 4y ago

Bitbucket used to fall over for monorepos. Sometimes it would fall into a death spiral, sometimes it would attribute PRs and commits to the wrong engineers (!!!) Not sure if that's still the case, but it was awful working with it. Don't even get me started on the dumpster fire that is Jira.

llamaLord 4y ago
We 100% have had issues with larger repo's in the past while we were still hosted on a stand-alone data centre. Since finishing our migration to AWS ~12 months ago, all stability and performance metrics are substantially improved. https://bitbucket.org/blog/bitbucket-cloud-has-landed-in-aws https://bitbucket.org/blog/bitbucket-cloud-has-landed-in-aws Full disclosure, we do still have some work to do in terms of supporting very large repo's (>10GB non-LFS) - but those scenarios are still handled relatively gracefully.