13 ms·
I'd be surprised if it takes more than 5 seconds for a human to solve each. Keep in mind that 27 seconds was the time in the queue from submit to solve. 24 seco
by biot 15y ago
I'd be surprised if it takes more than 5 seconds for a human to solve each. Keep in mind that 27 seconds was the time in the queue from submit to solve. 24 seconds of that might have been spent in the backlog and 3 seconds being viewed and solved by a human.
Additionally, it supposes that all images being solved are the kind that a human must do. Tons of CAPTCHA images being output by naive generators can be solved automatically. I'd be surprised if every image submitted isn't going through an automated solver first with only the < 95% confidence ones being sent to a human.
Actually, you could do a hybrid model where every image is auto-solved and a human can either click to confirm that the auto-solver got it right or manually type a new response. That should get your time per solve down to a second or two each.
- user24 15y ago> I'd be surprised if every image submitted isn't going through an automated solver first with only the < 95% confidence ones being sent to a human. Yes, that's how I'd do it too, but I don't know if they're that sophisticated yet (they'll get there though). Even with 1 second per solve, that's only $3.60 per hour. A massive improvement over 13c, but still certainly not worth anyone in my country's time.
- dzhiurgis 15y ago600 bucks per months is a great salary even in some european countries.