>There are so many things that go into store closures that they could always find a plausible pretext. Then why did Starbucks, no doubt availing themselves of

>There are so many things that go into store closures that they could always find a plausible pretext. Then why did Starbucks, no doubt availing themselves of very well-paid labor lawyers, lose this case to the NLRB? For these examples at least they were not able to provide plausible pretexts.