No it’s a word that the a party terminates an agreement because of workplace organization. I think the problem here is that property owners both want governmen

No it’s a word that the a party terminates an agreement because of workplace organization. I think the problem here is that property owners both want government protection but they specifically hate it when it doesn’t help them. If we don’t want the government interjecting itself into “contracts” then let’s have that. Courts and cops should not be enforcing contracts. People should not be going to prison for breaking contracts. It’s unfair to have it both ways. The government is currently protecting employers against employees - and not really the other way around. So maybe let’s balance government influence in contracts? It’s perfectly fine for the government to force a company to keep a store open because they unionized. In the grand scheme of things these companies still have a huge advantage.