4 ms·
> Well, I respectfully disagree, I'm a firm believer You have proposed no mehcanism to keep monopolies in check. You are a firm beliver in what? > giants that
by ClumsyPilot 4y ago
> Well, I respectfully disagree, I'm a firm believer
You have proposed no mehcanism to keep monopolies in check. You are a firm beliver in what?
> giants that have the monopoly move way faster than governments
So governments should be even more agressive and disproportionate to be effevtive? That is the inevitable conclusion of your argument.
- mattrighetti 4y agoThe conclusion of my argument is that regulations disincentive competition and that’s why you end up with monopolies, so keep regulations at minimum.
- lumb63 4y agoDo you have any examples? Net neutrality comes to mind, but that feels a quite extreme example due to complete regulatory capture of the FCC by big telecoms.
- ClumsyPilot 4y ago> regulations disincentive competition and that’s why you end up with monopolies, Seriously? There was no regulation on search, so how did google become a monopoly?