4 ms·
yup. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_of_attainder https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_of_attainder
by harywilke 4y ago
yup.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_of_attainder https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_of_attainder
- int_19h 4y agoIt would only be a bill of attainder if it used arbitrary characteristics not relevant to the stated purpose of the bill to target specific companies. The definition cited is not arbitrary in that sense - it targets large companies in specific markets, and there's an obvious rational connection with the stated purpose.
- afiori 4y agoI believe that both comment are trying to say that: - Google and Apple must do X => unconstitutional - All Companies bigger than X with chat-like apps and an app store and a near-oligopoly OS must do X => probably constitutional - All Companies such that (proceed to list dozen of random characteristics meant to only ever apply to Google and Apple ) must do X => probably unconstitutional