4 ms·
It's also a great example of how even such a little can go wrong. The CSS of the second website is wrong, as it uses 'color' without setting 'background-color'
by alduin32 4y ago
It's also a great example of how even such a little can go wrong.
The CSS of the second website is wrong, as it uses 'color' without setting 'background-color'. Assuming anything about the default background color is not possible because it is user-configurable in most browsers.
At least http://motherfuckingwebsite.com http://motherfuckingwebsite.com remains readable when you change your color settings (the second one is completely unreadable on my browser).
- bombcar 4y agoYou want https://thebestmotherfucking.website https://thebestmotherfucking.website
- low_tech_love 4y agoIt’s ok, but it’s already a bit too much. :)
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- j45 4y agoGood point. If the background color changes that often, I'm assuming there's probably a good test out there for that and more. The text was readable as designed on a white-background. CSS that considers accessibility or print friendly is always good to add.
- brigandish 4y ago> I'm assuming there's probably a good test out there for that and more. Javascript test?
- j45 4y agoYeah there's lots of a Javascript or css or html validators out there, and likely geared towards checking against a set of best practices. If it was a javascript that checked for the elements you want to ensure is there that would be neat too, I just wouldn't want it to be just me :)