4 ms·
Citation please? Seriously, there's no serious argument that suggests that this is the likelihood. Sometimes it gets better, sometimes it doesn't. The problem
by jrm4 4y ago
Citation please?
Seriously, there's no serious argument that suggests that this is the likelihood. Sometimes it gets better, sometimes it doesn't. The problem is, no one notices the good stuff due to regulation because you're just used to it.
Frankly, it's getting irritating that people aren't understanding this more?
- phendrenad2 4y agoWhy is a citation needed for something that's logically obvious? Why do we need to provide links to an "expert" telling us 3+3=6 when we can just use a calculator?
- jrm4 4y agoAre you suggesting that 3+3=6 is as axiomatically "truthful" as "regulation is bad for business?"
- phendrenad2 4y agoNo, why do you get that impression from what I actually said?
- ClumsyPilot 4y agoBecause you are getting the basics of economics wrong. You have spent many years of schooling learning to count. Have you studied economics for at least 1 year of formal education? Have you read a book by a real economist? Read 'Economics, the user's guide'. This is not how they think, this is not how they argue. What we have here, is a person who hasnt learnt math arguing that 3 + 3 = 7 and claiming it's logically obvious. Or like a medieval scientist arguing that Spontaneous Generation (Mice spawn in straw by themselves) is a law of physics and it's logically obvious.
- jrm4 4y agoLol, Making me flex this one. I have an undergrad degree in economics from Harvard University. Gotta say it makes me pretty well equipped to poke at how BS it often is. edit: this is me idiotically angrily responding incorrectly to the wrong person. leaving it for the message "don't trust these clowns with fancy degrees, they often are clueless" :)
- phendrenad2 4y agoI really love it when people "flex" their training by converting every question in life into something in their domain and then shouting at everyone who argues with them. Love it. Economists are often the worst, because almost everything involves money, so you can just pretend that every problem is an economics problem.
- ClumsyPilot 4y agoI have nwber thought if that, they can convert engineering problem into and economics problem.
- phendrenad2 4y agoSee you're assuming that you get to say that this is an economics problem. It isn't.