3 ms·

> COVID, as we know it, started to spread worldwide in February 2020, I remember it quite well actually :p The Spanish government found it to have been in Barc

> COVID, as we know it, started to spread worldwide in February 2020, I remember it quite well actually :p The Spanish government found it to have been in Barcelona sewers in Oct 2019. Italian government Sep. 2019. Period. ... I'll leave you to your bias.

NicoJuicy 4y ago
Like i said, that's already outdated. ( Can you read? ) Here in Cambodja 2010 - COVID 2 https://theconversation.com/in-2010-a-virus-similar-to-sars-cov-2-was-already-present-in-cambodia-154491 https://theconversation.com/in-2010-a-virus-similar-to-sars-... The Chinese biolab is in walking distance from the market, where the first infection was found. It has multiple awards for it's work in coronaviruses. Additionally, the huge overlap in the genome marker >96%. Should be easy, in case you have some common sense, no? :) Your version: Deadly COVID had an outbreak in the US, then napped for 8 months, traveled a bit over the world, re-appeared in Wuhan, from the US... to 1 person - patient Zero. Then! Patient Zero went to a cave ~40 miles further, back in time and infected some bats with an earlier version of deadly COVID SARS 2.. rofl Or my version ( where time travel doesn't exist): You are obviously not aware of the fact that multiple coronaviruses exists ( eg. The common cold is one), explains multiple variants since 2010. It further evolved in a bat cave in China ( see: the similar genome), could have gone through a biolab in China and then spread from China or through animal-to-human transfer ( since bats are a Chinese delicassy) and then spread from China. That also explains SARS ( also a coronavirus) coming from China. Simple, right? Ps. About Italy. Your entire claim is not proof, since this is what the research mentions: > In addition, we cannot exclude that the observed sero-reactivity could be an unknown antigen specificity in another virus to which subjects were exposed containing an epitope adventitiously cross-reactive with an epitope of SARS-CoV-2. If you can still read, this means that they haven't found proof of SARS COVID in Italy in 2019 ( or elsewhere), they found proof of a similar antigen that is triggered by COVID, but that's not exclusively attributed to COVID SARS 2! Glad to be of assistance for you! I'd trust biomarkers to track COVID origins fyi :)

NicoJuicy 4y ago

Like i said, that's already outdated. ( Can you read? ) Here in Cambodja 2010 - COVID 2 https://theconversation.com/in-2010-a-virus-similar-to-sars-cov-2-was-already-present-in-cambodia-154491 https://theconversation.com/in-2010-a-virus-similar-to-sars-... The Chinese biolab is in walking distance from the market, where the first infection was found. It has multiple awards for it's work in coronaviruses. Additionally, the huge overlap in the genome marker >96%. Should be easy, in case you have some common sense, no? :) Your version: Deadly COVID had an outbreak in the US, then napped for 8 months, traveled a bit over the world, re-appeared in Wuhan, from the US... to 1 person - patient Zero. Then! Patient Zero went to a cave ~40 miles further, back in time and infected some bats with an earlier version of deadly COVID SARS 2.. rofl Or my version ( where time travel doesn't exist): You are obviously not aware of the fact that multiple coronaviruses exists ( eg. The common cold is one), explains multiple variants since 2010. It further evolved in a bat cave in China ( see: the similar genome), could have gone through a biolab in China and then spread from China or through animal-to-human transfer ( since bats are a Chinese delicassy) and then spread from China. That also explains SARS ( also a coronavirus) coming from China. Simple, right? Ps. About Italy. Your entire claim is not proof, since this is what the research mentions: > In addition, we cannot exclude that the observed sero-reactivity could be an unknown antigen specificity in another virus to which subjects were exposed containing an epitope adventitiously cross-reactive with an epitope of SARS-CoV-2. If you can still read, this means that they haven't found proof of SARS COVID in Italy in 2019 ( or elsewhere), they found proof of a similar antigen that is triggered by COVID, but that's not exclusively attributed to COVID SARS 2! Glad to be of assistance for you! I'd trust biomarkers to track COVID origins fyi :)