4 ms·
Still sounds like your opinion vs his. That's not "failing" that's at most "it doesn't work for me", but without explaining why it doesn't work for you, it rea
by berkes 4y ago
Still sounds like your opinion vs his.
That's not "failing" that's at most "it doesn't work for me", but without explaining why it doesn't work for you, it really is little more than a wild claim.
I've had great success with "Clean code" practices. Though I implement it more according to Alistair Cockburns' "Hexagonal Architecture", it's overall very similar and strives for the same goals using the same methods. So in that sense, N=1 it hasn't failed. It has helped at least one person.
- loup-vaillant 4y ago> Still sound like your opinion vs his. Can't do much better in short HN comments. I've tried at times to be more rigorous than that, but so far I've only scratched the surface: https://loup-vaillant.fr/articles/good-code https://loup-vaillant.fr/articles/good-code