2 ms·
Why? Because it is suggesting that the only way to have lasting prosperity is to enslave women. How is that not immediately obvious to you? I live in one of th
by toxik 4y ago
Why? Because it is suggesting that the only way to have lasting prosperity is to enslave women. How is that not immediately obvious to you?
I live in one of the countries that, supposedly, support parents so much, and these society offer nowhere near the amount of support required to raise children and have both parents with day jobs. Nowhere NEAR enough.
The logic is very simple. You do not have time and energy to support even one child while living a fulfilling life if both parents work.
That is my explanation, and I didn't have to call women's rights into question. Weird, huh.
When you use a disgusting explanation model, you need a very strong case. Your case is make-believe and handwaving.
- riffraff 4y agoI think you misinterpreted my words: it's fantastic that humans (both men and women) have more options, if they choose to have less kids that's noone's business but their own. We did ok as a species with way less people that exist today, society will adapt, and there is no valid reason to impose "society's choice" on anyone.