3 ms·
I doubt it, either way they were here before Europeans who declared them non-human and assumed ownership of the landmass based on that declaration.
by dawdaway 4y ago
I doubt it, either way they were here before Europeans who declared them non-human and assumed ownership of the landmass based on that declaration.
- defrost 4y agoFor the international audience, that UK assumption of "Terra Nullus" was knocked back and overturned by the Mabo decision of 1992: In Mabo v. Queensland (No. 2), judgments of the High Court inserted the legal doctrine of native title into Australian law. The High Court recognised the fact that Indigenous peoples had lived in Australia for thousands of years and enjoyed rights to their land according to their own laws and customs. https://aiatsis.gov.au/explore/mabo-case https://aiatsis.gov.au/explore/mabo-case
- ROTMetro 4y agoI'm sorry, did all Europeans declare them non-human? What a sweeping weak sauce generalization about an entire group of people.
- dawdaway 4y agoAhh, sweet gotcha you found there fella. I don't think I need to explain to you the difference between members of the British government declaring Australia Terra-Nulius (with approximately 0 outcry from their citizens) and some bozo deciding that all Indigenous Australians don't believe in science. If you cant see the difference it's only because you choose not to.