I was going to see if they imparted any meaning into the angle they chose to CSS transform, knowing Google and all, but alas, they just did 1 degree. First off

I was going to see if they imparted any meaning into the angle they chose to CSS transform, knowing Google and all, but alas, they just did 1 degree. First off, I thought that it would be cool if they rotated a proportion of 360 degrees equal to the proportion of the change in orbital time period to the previous orbital time period of the asteroid. Then I realized that it changed by around 5%, so that would be 360 * 0.05 = 18 degrees. Not really readable. That's 2 minutes that I'll never get back, but it's left me amused for some reason. Heh.