> I'm sure the 1/3000th of a millisecond per year won't be a problem But that’s several orders of magnitude incorrect. FTA: > Clocks run faster on the moon th

> I'm sure the 1/3000th of a millisecond per year won't be a problem But that’s several orders of magnitude incorrect. FTA: > Clocks run faster on the moon than on Earth, gaining about 56 microseconds each day Unless my maths is wrong isn’t it actually 200 milliseconds per year? It’s not a lot of time, sure. But it seems important to people like scientists. Which, not coincidentally, is probably the most ”practical” thing people will be doing while spending time on the moon.