3 ms·
> Women will choose to have fewer kids if given the option. This right here. Having a kid is an intensely personal and individual decision. Generalizations lik
by mxkopy 4y ago
> Women will choose to have fewer kids if given the option.
This right here. Having a kid is an intensely personal and individual decision. Generalizations like this are the essence of bigotry.
Women that have more social responsibilities will choose to have fewer kids. Now, is that because they're women, or because of the responsibility? Which one do you think matters more?
Also, the idea that women must be cajoled by society into having children is just profane. Women actually want to have kids, you know (I guess not from personal experience?). It's a biological fact. Women can have equal rights and also want kids because wanting kids is natural.
- refurb 4y agoHuh? “More social responsibilities”? Like what? Plenty of women choose to have lots of kids. There is no “responsibility” to have kids or not, its a choice. Not sure why you argue with empirical fact that has been seen across the global when countries develop. When given the option to have fewer kids, women have fewer kids. You seem offended with the choices women make. Like they shouldnt be making that choice for themselves.
- mxkopy 4y ago> Huh? “More social responsibilities”? Like what? Plenty of women choose to have lots of kids. There is no “responsibility”. This is incoherent. Average modern life has many more social demands than it did 100 years ago. > You seem offended You seem to be familiar with all the memes. Have fun!
- refurb 4y agoWe're not talking 100 years ago. You only need to go back to 1970 to see the drop in birth rates. Does 1970's America have much less social responsibilities?
- mxkopy 4y agoYou should be talking about a hundred years ago. The causes for these trends aren't spontaneous, they're historical. So you look at history. Are the 1970's really more important than WWI? than the industrial revolution? than Enlightenment?