Given what I've read of the proceedings, the states are claiming injury on behalf of loan servicers. The supreme court doesn't play that way. Injured parties

Given what I've read of the proceedings, the states are claiming injury on behalf of loan servicers. The supreme court doesn't play that way. Injured parties must claim injury on their own behalf. Justice demands its pound of flesh. That the states went to the supreme court without standing may in fact doom their case. But if that does happen, it's purely procedural and will not establish a precedent. The conservative justices are vocally against the idea of eroding the separation of powers, so they'll be especially motivated to keep the ruling narrow.