3 ms·
My vendor’s products haven’t harmed me in any way I can identify but if they did that would be good cause for me to reconsider them. That would also be good cau
by eyelidlessness 4y ago
My vendor’s products haven’t harmed me in any way I can identify but if they did that would be good cause for me to reconsider them. That would also be good cause for your analysis of “Stockholm Syndrome”.
- rektide 4y agoIm seeing freedom vs being trapped with criminal behaviors. Having freedom wouldnt stop you from relating to these dirtbags, freely if you want. But you shouldnt be forced to keep staying with them. So, still feeling pretty good about my analysis so far.
- eyelidlessness 4y agoSo I’m free to prefer my vendor’s behavior and you’re free to not prefer it? Sounds like we totally agree 100%!
- rektide 4y agoYou're not free to prefer your vendor taking hostages though. (Or at least there should strong extenuating circumstances, for why you think there's some imperative strong enough to justifying extreme/active harm.) Thanks. Your vendor needs some social conscience & to sometimes not always use force to get their way.
- not_me_ever 4y agoSo who forces you to buy their phones?