4 ms·

Ok, but what does any of that have to do with what I've been asking? I've not once said that ChatGPT is capable of anything other than what you describe. I've

Ok, but what does any of that have to do with what I've been asking? I've not once said that ChatGPT is capable of anything other than what you describe. I've been saying that it's not capable of going beyond what it does, yet. ChatGPT, specifically, may never get there, but technology like it will. Aside from that, I'd be interested in hearing what you think of the questions I asked.

weard_beard 4y ago
> Is it? How does one come to know what you've said is true? What sensations were involved that proved that? Did you feel it? Hear it? Smell it? Taste it? See it? I think I just answered that one. I read it with my own eyes and used language to interact. > On that note, what exactly is sensation? Is it not data? No. It is not. It is in the name of the thing LLM. Language Learning Model. The data in this context is Language. Language CAN be read. Language CAN be heard. In this context it is instead being reduced to a mathematic scoring matrix in lieu of comprehension. > Then my basic rights should be stripped away because I frequently believe things to be true which are not in actual fact true. I've written a couple longform pieces on this in the past few days. Suffice to say. No. I did point out that we incarcerate or deny rights to humans that cannot tell the difference between real and unreal or the truth, but that's really a counter example to what I'm getting at. Whether you do or don't acknowledge it, you have the HARDWARE necessary. The ability. It has no such ability. That's what I'm really getting at. > I don't think it's a big leap at all to say that current technology is one relatively small leap away from being able achieve what the human brain does. I also don't think that technology needs to do it the way humans do. I think giving an AI external stimuli to evaluate the physical world the way it evaluates Language and training it similarly is a rather large hurdle. With Language we're building, "super mario galaxy". With sensors and stimuli we're still at pac man. > ChatGPT and the like are merely octopii that have a tentacle on a single telegram signal, for now. I'd say more like a solar powered calculator with a thermometer duct taped to it labeled, "plant life"

weard_beard 4y ago

> Is it? How does one come to know what you've said is true? What sensations were involved that proved that? Did you feel it? Hear it? Smell it? Taste it? See it? I think I just answered that one. I read it with my own eyes and used language to interact. > On that note, what exactly is sensation? Is it not data? No. It is not. It is in the name of the thing LLM. Language Learning Model. The data in this context is Language. Language CAN be read. Language CAN be heard. In this context it is instead being reduced to a mathematic scoring matrix in lieu of comprehension. > Then my basic rights should be stripped away because I frequently believe things to be true which are not in actual fact true. I've written a couple longform pieces on this in the past few days. Suffice to say. No. I did point out that we incarcerate or deny rights to humans that cannot tell the difference between real and unreal or the truth, but that's really a counter example to what I'm getting at. Whether you do or don't acknowledge it, you have the HARDWARE necessary. The ability. It has no such ability. That's what I'm really getting at. > I don't think it's a big leap at all to say that current technology is one relatively small leap away from being able achieve what the human brain does. I also don't think that technology needs to do it the way humans do. I think giving an AI external stimuli to evaluate the physical world the way it evaluates Language and training it similarly is a rather large hurdle. With Language we're building, "super mario galaxy". With sensors and stimuli we're still at pac man. > ChatGPT and the like are merely octopii that have a tentacle on a single telegram signal, for now. I'd say more like a solar powered calculator with a thermometer duct taped to it labeled, "plant life"