5 ms·

Intel had published results and “surprisingly” they are the opposite https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/performance/cloud-facts.html https://www.i

• pclmulqdq 4y ago
  One person is compiling with -march=native (Intel) and using hand-tuned AVX-512 where appropriate. The other is running an application, and wants good performance for the money without too much vendor lock-in.
  • anonymousDan 4y ago
    In other words, if you care about performance go with Intel? As for vendor lock-in, how is relying on AWS specific hw much better (see other comments below)?
    • jsty 4y ago
      If you care about performance to the extent of inlining hand-tuned assembly, you almost certainly care enough to do your own perf benchmarking on your own workloads.
    • pclmulqdq 4y ago
      Presumably, you aren't doing anything special in those ARM builds, so you can use an x86 build just as easily (or a non-Amazon ARM chip) depending on cost.
  • intelVISA 4y ago
    if(AMD){ slowPath(); } "Wow Intel's so much faster..!"