Why are you deriving general statements from an article that are making specific claims about specific matters. ELA[1] as the CDC defines it, and as the article

Why are you deriving general statements from an article that are making specific claims about specific matters. ELA[1] as the CDC defines it, and as the article referenses back to, is "A (witnessed) traumatic event is a frightening, dangerous, or violent event that poses a threat to a (loved one)/child’s life or bodily integrity." There is no 'Depends on what particular "stress and adversity" from early life/ ELA.' > From what we have learnt from Spirituality and all of the wise philosophers, that sounds contradictory. Such a loaded statement. Coming from the assumption that there is anything reliable from spirituality or wise or unwise philosphers, doesn't mean that there reasons are justified truth belief, just anecdotal observations. > Most of the teachings of philosophy point to adversity and stress as events from which we can learn from and become more stronger mentally Can you please provide sources and not assume its common knowledge. > It's possible that always being in this state of stress can morph your worldview to always be broken, and perhaps that is what's being referenced and reflected here. "Possible," do you have any reasons to back up your claim? [1] https://www.nctsn.org/what-is-child-trauma/about-child-trauma https://www.nctsn.org/what-is-child-trauma/about-child-traum...