4 ms·
> The beauty of digital libraries is (if they are free) endless copies can be made. That's where real longevity stems from. Unfortunately this is demonstrably
by derstander 4y ago
> The beauty of digital libraries is (if they are free) endless copies can be made. That's where real longevity stems from.
Unfortunately this is demonstrably not the case with libraries’ current digital offerings. Not only are endless copies not allowed to be made, they often are more costly and have a limited amount of borrowings allowed of them.
https://www.wgbh.org/news/local-news/2020/01/06/inside-the-e-book-war-waging-between-libraries-and-publishers https://www.wgbh.org/news/local-news/2020/01/06/inside-the-e...
- WalterBright 4y agoI know. If I was Prez, copyright would be eliminated entirely, or at least limited to 10 years.
- derstander 4y agoIf copyright was more reasonable, we could also have avoided the whole hullabaloo about Roald Dahl: those who want censored versions could have them, and those who want the originals could have those. I think we'd see a rise in small-run book-on-demand style publishing, which I have always had a soft spot for.
- antibasilisk 4y agoLibrary Genesis doesn't seem to have this problem, curious
- derstander 4y agoNeither does Sci-Hub. I'm certainly willing to advocate for copyright reform through legislative action, for instance, but of all the hills I could die on it's not the one I'd choose above all others with respect to monetary fines or imprisonment.
- ravagat 4y agoA lot of libraries both public and private are failing at this. Unfortunately I've asked a few librarians and IT folks in the same libraries, the consensus seems to be that it does not make sense financially for the libraries. Yet. I hope there will be change along this but we are not there yet