4 ms·
This has been known for at least a decade. https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/a-three-hour-tour/ https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/a-three-hour-
by _dain_ 4y ago
This has been known for at least a decade.
https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/a-three-hour-tour/ https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/a-three-hour-tour/
>Here’s a scenario. A ship from some Indian civilization about 4000 years ago [maybe Indus] loses its way and ends up crashing on the shore of Arnhem Land. Like most ships, its crew is all male. They survive the landing, and end up warring with a local tribe. Eventually, they kill off most of the men and annex the sobbing women. The new tribe has 5x higher carrying capacity, essentially due to better technology, and they’re militarily superior as well – better weapons and tactics. They expand and expand, picking up more and more old Australian genes as they do so. Not as an empire – they’re too simple for that – but the tribes that descend from them keep winning. They speak the ancestor of the Macro-Pama-Nyungan languages, which originates as a mix between their old-Dravidian language (from the men) and some local Australian tongue (from the women).
>One funny thing about this scenario: the sailors lose almost all of their civilization, and probably thought they were descending into savagery. On the other hand, the locals probably thought of the castaways as incredibly advanced, magicians or gods. They were both right.
- ace2358 4y agoThis is a completely baseless theory with no citations or evidence at all other than the “11% ancestry” (what does that mean?). “Let assume that this new analysis is correct.” Yeah okay mate. I wouldn’t say that “this is a known fact”
- _dain_ 4y agoit's based on DNA studies and ancestry percentage has a perfectly well-defined meaning
- ace2358 4y agoI understand how the theory of dna ancestry works, but it’s not so clear cut. We still don’t have a good understanding of how these things work over the time scales of Australia (60,000 years of inhabitation). Saying that one boat accidentally crashed and took over Australia culturally is technically possible but completely without evidence, “11%” or not.
- mr_toad 4y ago> incredibly advanced, magicians or gods. Four thousand years ago pre-dates the Bronze Age in southern India by quite a bit, so not really that advanced.