5 ms·
While this is cool this doesn't change my opinion at all. Each still image is still not that impressive. Good for them using the tech in a clever way but i don
by ChildOfChaos 4y ago
While this is cool this doesn't change my opinion at all.
Each still image is still not that impressive. Good for them using the tech in a clever way but i don't find this that relevant.
- pksebben 4y agothose trees are part of a forest, you know. the benefits of such fine grained control aren't a trick. it's why they were able to scrap together frames that don't jump all over the place (mostly). the other benefit of such a broadly hacked upon model is that it grows in leaps and bounds. All due respect to mid journey, but the stable diffusion hype is not just hype.
- ChildOfChaos 4y agoI agree, don't believe it's just hype, that level of control is useful, but for outright image quality and for most use cases, midjourney is better. I still don't like the look of most of the Stable diffusion images, they just look slightly off/amateurish to me, where as midjourney produces images that make you go 'wow' If you wanted to use these tools, midjourney would be my go too, with stable diffusion a backup for when some of the additional features were needed, perhaps inpanting on a midjourney image and using controlnet if needed but if you just want a pure image, midjourney is what you want.