4 ms·

One can examine the ethics of a racial question by switching the races. If you were asked whether or not "It's Ok to Be Black" or "It's Ok to be Jewish" or "It

One can examine the ethics of a racial question by switching the races. If you were asked whether or not "It's Ok to Be Black" or "It's Ok to be Jewish" or "It's Ok to Be Hispanic" or "It's Ok to be Asian" and answered with anything but "yes", what would people say about you?

xpe 4y ago
I agree this is a useful philosophical and logical lens. Rearranging logical statements and forms and ensuring that certain higher principles hold (which we might call 'moral invariants') is a useful way to do moral reasoning! Still, the logical reasoning above is only part of the larger discussion of human meaning in general and {race and identity} in particular. Words relating to history and culture are not so neatly substitutable and reversible. Personal note: I hope I've been at least clear (and perhaps even persuasive) w.r.t. to the subjective interpretation of survey questions. Merely swapping labels without bringing along the cultural and mental connections isn't enough. Example: a narrow textual analysis of the following phrases tends to miss what people actually mean when using them: - "Black lives matter" - "All lives matter" - "Blue lives matter" --- A summary of the necessary context, from the corresponding Wikipedia pages, copypastad today: > Black Lives Matter (BLM) is a decentralized political and social movement that seeks to highlight racism, discrimination, and racial inequality experienced by black people. Its primary concerns are incidents of police brutality and racially motivated violence against black people. It started following the killings of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and Rekia Boyd, among others. The movement and its related organizations typically advocate for various policy changes considered to be related to black liberation. --- > The All Lives Matter movement was created as a response to the Black Lives Matter movement. Use of the phrase began as an inclusive alternative to Black Lives Matter, though it quickly became associated with opposition to the Black Lives Matter movement. The use of the All Lives Matter slogan on Twitter following the murders of Michael Brown and Eric Garner began in 2014 to "undermine the purpose and message of the #BlackLivesMatter call to action", and it was used to deny recognition of racial violence against African Americans. Some supporters of the Black Lives Matter movement adopted the All Lives Matter slogan to shift debate away from semantics, while others avoided the term entirely. --- > Blue Lives Matter (also known as Police Lives Matter) is a countermovement in the United States advocating that those who are prosecuted and convicted of killing law enforcement officers should be sentenced under hate crime statutes. > Critics have pointed out that while being Black is an identity-based characteristic, being a police officer is a choice, and that police officers are already typically respected and honored in communities. They add that attacking or killing a police officer already carries a higher penalty than attacking a non-police officer, and argue that the movement is really more about suppressing minorities than supporting law enforcement.

xpe 4y ago

I agree this is a useful philosophical and logical lens. Rearranging logical statements and forms and ensuring that certain higher principles hold (which we might call 'moral invariants') is a useful way to do moral reasoning! Still, the logical reasoning above is only part of the larger discussion of human meaning in general and {race and identity} in particular. Words relating to history and culture are not so neatly substitutable and reversible. Personal note: I hope I've been at least clear (and perhaps even persuasive) w.r.t. to the subjective interpretation of survey questions. Merely swapping labels without bringing along the cultural and mental connections isn't enough. Example: a narrow textual analysis of the following phrases tends to miss what people actually mean when using them: - "Black lives matter" - "All lives matter" - "Blue lives matter" --- A summary of the necessary context, from the corresponding Wikipedia pages, copypastad today: > Black Lives Matter (BLM) is a decentralized political and social movement that seeks to highlight racism, discrimination, and racial inequality experienced by black people. Its primary concerns are incidents of police brutality and racially motivated violence against black people. It started following the killings of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and Rekia Boyd, among others. The movement and its related organizations typically advocate for various policy changes considered to be related to black liberation. --- > The All Lives Matter movement was created as a response to the Black Lives Matter movement. Use of the phrase began as an inclusive alternative to Black Lives Matter, though it quickly became associated with opposition to the Black Lives Matter movement. The use of the All Lives Matter slogan on Twitter following the murders of Michael Brown and Eric Garner began in 2014 to "undermine the purpose and message of the #BlackLivesMatter call to action", and it was used to deny recognition of racial violence against African Americans. Some supporters of the Black Lives Matter movement adopted the All Lives Matter slogan to shift debate away from semantics, while others avoided the term entirely. --- > Blue Lives Matter (also known as Police Lives Matter) is a countermovement in the United States advocating that those who are prosecuted and convicted of killing law enforcement officers should be sentenced under hate crime statutes. > Critics have pointed out that while being Black is an identity-based characteristic, being a police officer is a choice, and that police officers are already typically respected and honored in communities. They add that attacking or killing a police officer already carries a higher penalty than attacking a non-police officer, and argue that the movement is really more about suppressing minorities than supporting law enforcement.