3 ms·

Key word being "had". He is not part of it any more. >In 2018, Musk resigned his board seat, citing "a potential future conflict [of interest]" with his role

Key word being "had". He is not part of it any more. >In 2018, Musk resigned his board seat, citing "a potential future conflict [of interest]" with his role as CEO of Tesla due to Tesla's AI development for self-driving cars, but remained a donor I don't think he counts as an investor, and I'd imagine he has stopped donating.

atchoo 4y ago
The irony here is that Musk resigned in order to pursue his own closed-source for profit AI businesses and is now complaining about OpenAI being closed-source and for profit AI. If people are feeling conflicted about who the asshole is in this situation, don't be, they are all morally bankrupt assholes who all already have many lifetimes of unimaginable wealth yet must take ever more. These are not people who should have any power in our world.
- dotnet00 4y ago
  The difference is that Tesla isn't claiming to be open about AI.
  - ChickenNugger 4y ago
    And resigning because he was working on a competitor was completely the right thing to do. It would have been a conflict of interest. How often does that type of integrity even happen nowadays? The whole "ELON MUSK BAD NOW" change to the zeitgeist is alarming to me. He was the darling of the left for years because of Tesla and SpaceX, but now he's completely persona non grata for...reasons? It smacks of excommunication for heresy.
    - DennisP 4y ago
      He got richer so he must be bad. How you can build a successful car company in the US without getting super rich, I don't know.
    - sidibe 4y ago
      Might it also have to do with his positions on almost everything conflicting with most people's? A lot of people didn't realize what a narcissistic manchild he was until recently.
permo-w 4y ago
this is pedantic, but the parent comment was conjugating "to have" to "had" via the subjunctive, not via the past tense
- udev4096 4y ago
  He's right tho
  - permo-w 4y ago
    oh yeah of course, no question there
- wodenokoto 4y ago
  I don’t know what a subjunctive is. Maybe that is what caused the confusion.

atchoo 4y ago

The irony here is that Musk resigned in order to pursue his own closed-source for profit AI businesses and is now complaining about OpenAI being closed-source and for profit AI. If people are feeling conflicted about who the asshole is in this situation, don't be, they are all morally bankrupt assholes who all already have many lifetimes of unimaginable wealth yet must take ever more. These are not people who should have any power in our world.

dotnet00 4y ago
The difference is that Tesla isn't claiming to be open about AI.
- ChickenNugger 4y ago
  And resigning because he was working on a competitor was completely the right thing to do. It would have been a conflict of interest. How often does that type of integrity even happen nowadays? The whole "ELON MUSK BAD NOW" change to the zeitgeist is alarming to me. He was the darling of the left for years because of Tesla and SpaceX, but now he's completely persona non grata for...reasons? It smacks of excommunication for heresy.
  - DennisP 4y ago
    He got richer so he must be bad. How you can build a successful car company in the US without getting super rich, I don't know.
  - sidibe 4y ago
    Might it also have to do with his positions on almost everything conflicting with most people's? A lot of people didn't realize what a narcissistic manchild he was until recently.

permo-w 4y ago

this is pedantic, but the parent comment was conjugating "to have" to "had" via the subjunctive, not via the past tense

udev4096 4y ago
He's right tho
- permo-w 4y ago
  oh yeah of course, no question there
wodenokoto 4y ago
I don’t know what a subjunctive is. Maybe that is what caused the confusion.