5 ms·
Ugh, no, that's a bad idea. Fantasy adaptation on TV need to be based on a plot which is realistically complete in 2, maybe 3 season max. And by complete, I mea
by Yizahi 4y ago
Ugh, no, that's a bad idea. Fantasy adaptation on TV need to be based on a plot which is realistically complete in 2, maybe 3 season max. And by complete, I mean without any cliffhangers. Lore may exist for the universe, but should not be a mandatory pre-requisite. Preferably it needs to avoid large battles, big creatures and alien architecture, all that to lower production costs.
For example - Chronicles of Amber by Zelazny, super cool, I would very much like to see it on TV but honestly it would be a failure in production, butchered by the studio and abandoned after 1 or 2 season while needing 5+.
Another example - Memory, Sorrow and Thorn by Williams. Full medieval setting, minimum number of fantasy creatures and screen time with them, small cast. With liberally cutting out whole chapters it can be adapted into an inexpensive, optimally paced 2-3 season show or even movie series a-la LOTR. Diversity in built in, so there is possibility that director won't butcher existing characters for the sake of it.
So the source material to be adapted need to be carefully picked with TV constraints in mind, not just whatever is popular among readers.
- BerislavLopac 4y agoI remember reading recently that Amber is being adapted.
- Yizahi 4y agoYeah, I read that too somewhere and dread the release day. After seeing Rings of Power and Wheel of Time (but especially ROP) my expectations for new fantasy TV is at absolute zero.
- mgarfias 4y ago+1 for memory, sorrow, and thorn.