5 ms·
You are completely changing the problem. Remember, this is an example, the code does the same thing in either implementation.
by incrudible 4y ago
You are completely changing the problem. Remember, this is an example, the code does the same thing in either implementation.
- cratermoon 4y ago> completely changing the problem Indeed. That's the point. Why let someone with an axe to grind define the problem in a way they can solve with their axe? The author is using optimization as the frame for rejecting a particular way of working, I'm pointing out that the definition is set up to make the solution work. I don't concede the terms of the debate before it even begins.