4 ms·

Not sure what you mean. The development is all over the internet. E.g. https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urgent-mrnas-jabs-may-have-caused?utm_source=substack

Not sure what you mean. The development is all over the internet. E.g. https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urgent-mrnas-jabs-may-have-caused?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urgent-mrnas-jabs-may-ha... There's a reason why vaccines were suddenly "de-emphasised" lately. (The language of your reply is aggressive)

pinewurst 4y ago
From the Nature article selectively quoted by this link, “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination has been shown to be safe and effective in multiple trials1,2,3,4. Vaccine pharmacovigilance has revealed diverse rare side effects in the setting of population-wide administration5,6, including off-target cardiovascular effects, with the most well-characterized being myocarditis7,8” Hardly a mass scandal other than in the eyes of antivaxxers.
Kye 4y ago
>> "The development is all over the internet." Like with conspiracy theory stickers plastered all over a 1994 Ford Ranger, one thing being covered in another is not an indicator of credibility.
- resource0x 4y ago
  Everything you disagree with is a conspiracy. That's exactly the topic of this thread.
  - glaucon 4y ago
    Conspiracy theories are not the same as increased polarization. If you could wave a magic wand and remove all conspiracy theories from human consciousness there would still be plenty of room for polarization of thought. I thought Pinewurst's ("From the Nature article selectively quoted ...") response to your comment about COVID vaccines was interesting. Rather than introducing the issue of conspiracy theories would you care to address his response ?
    - resource0x 4y ago
      Thank you for the comment free of rude language and labels, This is a rarity nowadays. :-) (BTW, the notion of conspiracy was brought up not by me, I was just responding to the parent). The quote GP cited is taken from the preamble. You have to read the whole article. I was born in USSR and lived there for almost 40 years. Every essay, thesis, dissertation, and science article was supposed to contain the preamble where the authors had to declare their allegiance to the causes of the Communist Party. Even if the dissertation was about elliptic curves. In the preamble, you were supposed also to include some quotes from Lenin, Marx, and the latest Plenum of the Central Committee. And only then were you allowed to proceed to your treatment of elliptic curves. Does this answer your question?

pinewurst 4y ago

From the Nature article selectively quoted by this link, “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination has been shown to be safe and effective in multiple trials1,2,3,4. Vaccine pharmacovigilance has revealed diverse rare side effects in the setting of population-wide administration5,6, including off-target cardiovascular effects, with the most well-characterized being myocarditis7,8” Hardly a mass scandal other than in the eyes of antivaxxers.

Kye 4y ago

>> "The development is all over the internet." Like with conspiracy theory stickers plastered all over a 1994 Ford Ranger, one thing being covered in another is not an indicator of credibility.

resource0x 4y ago
Everything you disagree with is a conspiracy. That's exactly the topic of this thread.
- glaucon 4y ago
  Conspiracy theories are not the same as increased polarization. If you could wave a magic wand and remove all conspiracy theories from human consciousness there would still be plenty of room for polarization of thought. I thought Pinewurst's ("From the Nature article selectively quoted ...") response to your comment about COVID vaccines was interesting. Rather than introducing the issue of conspiracy theories would you care to address his response ?
  - resource0x 4y ago
    Thank you for the comment free of rude language and labels, This is a rarity nowadays. :-) (BTW, the notion of conspiracy was brought up not by me, I was just responding to the parent). The quote GP cited is taken from the preamble. You have to read the whole article. I was born in USSR and lived there for almost 40 years. Every essay, thesis, dissertation, and science article was supposed to contain the preamble where the authors had to declare their allegiance to the causes of the Communist Party. Even if the dissertation was about elliptic curves. In the preamble, you were supposed also to include some quotes from Lenin, Marx, and the latest Plenum of the Central Committee. And only then were you allowed to proceed to your treatment of elliptic curves. Does this answer your question?