2 ms·
Oof, I didn't know it was that bad. On the other hand, a low frequency efficiency core is a good place for "bloat" to live. I think thats how Android/iOS remai
by brucethemoose2 4y ago
Oof, I didn't know it was that bad.
On the other hand, a low frequency efficiency core is a good place for "bloat" to live. I think thats how Android/iOS remain usable too.
Windows bloat on AMD runs on the big 4Ghz+ cores. And I suspect it does on Intel laptops with E cores too, as Windows isn't integrated enough to know that the Adobe updater and Norton Antivirus and the HP App Store are E core tasks. And even if it does, Intel runs their E cores faster than Apple anyway.