3 ms·
Well, I _might_ be able to teach an AI how to do effective legal research and writing, or even to do pre and post trial discovery, but representing someone at t
by ncphil 4y ago
Well, I _might_ be able to teach an AI how to do effective legal research and writing, or even to do pre and post trial discovery, but representing someone at trial? Not without full immunity from malpractice liability. It would be fun to see how an AI handled cross examination of a hostile witness, or dealt with a response to their hearsay objection like, "res gestae!".
Still, a sophisticated AI could be a real help in transactional legal matters like contracts, real estate, taxes, wills and trusts where boilerplate abounds. As far as grades go, my average in law school was C+ (I'd never seen a blue book before that first final -- in college it was all research papers), but I was also one of the 48% who passed a certain state's bar exam in 1982. So there is hope for those AIs who dream of a future in the legal profession.
Or maybe they'd just wind up as a sysadmin for a Fortune 200 company, and never regret it.
- bombcar 4y agoI have read enough bad lawsuits to believe an AI could be better than most pro se litigants.
- nullc 4y agoUnfortunately, the AI read the pro se litigants too. ;)
- bee_rider 4y agoI guess eventually a locally-installable ChatGPT-alike will become available. Someone will figure out how to fine-tune it on legal jargon, and then try and use it to represent themselves.