4 ms·
> It spread in July 2019 and then Covid went napping for 8 months ( according to unity1001) to spread from the US Holy hell. I told that it was found to be in
by unity1001 4y ago
> It spread in July 2019 and then Covid went napping for 8 months ( according to unity1001) to spread from the US
Holy hell. I told that it was found to be in Barcelona sewers in oct 2019. Sept 2019 in Italy.
It did not 'hibernate' and then 'came around' in february. It already spread and the government whose lies you are peddling was trying to suppress its presence even in february with Trump's court ordering the Seattle doctor that found the covid in US to shut up.
> China is lying.
They arent lying. You are buying into bullsh*t because of your inherent baseless bias. American conservative, Indian nationalist - doesnt matter which. The bait used for deceiving such people is always the same: They sell lies against whomever they hate.
Your bias against China even helped you totally avoid actual written words to the extent that you have come back to say "covid went napping".
No it didnt go napping you fool. Its just that you selectively ignored written words to back your bias.
- NicoJuicy 4y agoCOVID, as we know it, started to spread worldwide in February 2020, I remember it quite well actually :p You go defend the coronavirus virus was napping story for 8 months from a US lab leak. The deadly variant started near Wuhan in januari 2020. If you want common sense, add this too : https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04532-4 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04532-4 > the closest SARS-CoV-2 bat-borne genome still remains the one from R. affinis, RaTG13 (China, 20135,6), with 96.1% identity at the whole-genome level. https://theconversation.com/in-2010-a-virus-similar-to-sars-cov-2-was-already-present-in-cambodia-154491 https://theconversation.com/in-2010-a-virus-similar-to-sars-... And let's predate your US claim: 2010, a virus similar to SARS-CoV-2 was already present in Cambodia Coronavirusses are everywhere. It's the deadly one that counts. It's also not the first time that it started from China, due to their hygiene => eating bats. Remember: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002%E2%80%932004_SARS_outbreak https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002%E2%80%932004_SARS_outbr... Now you also know why neighbors from China wore masks the entire time ( pre COVID).
- unity1001 4y ago> COVID, as we know it, started to spread worldwide in February 2020, I remember it quite well actually :p The Spanish government found it to have been in Barcelona sewers in Oct 2019. Italian government Sep. 2019. Period. ... I'll leave you to your bias.
- NicoJuicy 4y agoLike i said, that's already outdated. ( Can you read? ) Here in Cambodja 2010 - COVID 2 https://theconversation.com/in-2010-a-virus-similar-to-sars-cov-2-was-already-present-in-cambodia-154491 https://theconversation.com/in-2010-a-virus-similar-to-sars-... The Chinese biolab is in walking distance from the market, where the first infection was found. It has multiple awards for it's work in coronaviruses. Additionally, the huge overlap in the genome marker >96%. Should be easy, in case you have some common sense, no? :) Your version: Deadly COVID had an outbreak in the US, then napped for 8 months, traveled a bit over the world, re-appeared in Wuhan, from the US... to 1 person - patient Zero. Then! Patient Zero went to a cave ~40 miles further, back in time and infected some bats with an earlier version of deadly COVID SARS 2.. rofl Or my version ( where time travel doesn't exist): You are obviously not aware of the fact that multiple coronaviruses exists ( eg. The common cold is one), explains multiple variants since 2010. It further evolved in a bat cave in China ( see: the similar genome), could have gone through a biolab in China and then spread from China or through animal-to-human transfer ( since bats are a Chinese delicassy) and then spread from China. That also explains SARS ( also a coronavirus) coming from China. Simple, right? Ps. About Italy. Your entire claim is not proof, since this is what the research mentions: > In addition, we cannot exclude that the observed sero-reactivity could be an unknown antigen specificity in another virus to which subjects were exposed containing an epitope adventitiously cross-reactive with an epitope of SARS-CoV-2. If you can still read, this means that they haven't found proof of SARS COVID in Italy in 2019 ( or elsewhere), they found proof of a similar antigen that is triggered by COVID, but that's not exclusively attributed to COVID SARS 2! Glad to be of assistance for you! I'd trust biomarkers to track COVID origins fyi :)