4 ms·
He-hey! Yes we are fast, but I don’t think we ever claimed 30x. We are faster in almost every workload (loose range scans for some reason), but at best by 7x (b
by ashvardanian 4y ago
He-hey! Yes we are fast, but I don’t think we ever claimed 30x. We are faster in almost every workload (loose range scans for some reason), but at best by 7x (batch reads) and 5x (batch writes). Still, this should be plenty for all intents and purposes! I can post some updates on that tomorrow :)
- ashvardanian 4y agoIf you are curious about how it works, here is a pretty good explanation: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ybWeUf_hC7o https://youtube.com/watch?v=ybWeUf_hC7o For some reason the conference hasn’t made the last years talks public or searchable, but you should be able to access it with a link