>“Shockingly tiny” fraction of our planet’s mammal mass is wild species How is this shocking? It should be obvious. Who is shocked, the scientists or us uneduc

>“Shockingly tiny” fraction of our planet’s mammal mass is wild species How is this shocking? It should be obvious. Who is shocked, the scientists or us uneducated peons? It's bad enough when journalists inject marketing-level emotional words into news stories, now peer-reviewed academic journals have to stoop to this?