The term "memory safety" is much older than Rust and very common, the "unsafe" keyword is based on that existing concept and I think that consistency is the rig

The term "memory safety" is much older than Rust and very common, the "unsafe" keyword is based on that existing concept and I think that consistency is the right choice here. I also don't have the impression that this is communicated in a way that leads to confusion with "correctness". What alternative name would you prefer to express the collection of memory safety features in programming languages?