4 ms·
Then it's still C++'s syntax, and Circle's syntax is still "ugly". Every modern languages adopt the "ugliness" style of type after name to solve most vexing par
by unrealhoang 4y ago
Then it's still C++'s syntax, and Circle's syntax is still "ugly".
Every modern languages adopt the "ugliness" style of type after name to solve most vexing parse, yet somehow C/C++ programmers are still confident in their "beautiful" syntax.
- pjmlp 4y agoSyntax being ugly isn't the problem for migration, rather 40 years of history deploying code into production.
- unrealhoang 4y agoThat's irrelevant to the discussion about syntax being ugly.