4 ms·
That's quite a stretch, Wayland and X (any X, 11 or hypothetical 12) are so vastly different that calling Wayland "the new X" is like calling Quartz "X for macO
by lloeki 4y ago
That's quite a stretch, Wayland and X (any X, 11 or hypothetical 12) are so vastly different that calling Wayland "the new X" is like calling Quartz "X for macOS".
- em-bee 4y agoisn't X11 a full redesign of X10 like Wayland is of X11?
- stonogo 4y agoNot a full redesign. It was sufficiently close that you could compile X10 software and link in -loldX and run it under X11.
- kevin_thibedeau 4y agoWayland doesn't inherit any architecture from X. XWayland is just a display server hosted by Wayland same as Exceed or Xorg on MS Windows. This is why X will never die since it can always be run on top of other graphical systems.
- sshine 4y agoYes, but the comparison is still valuable.
- mort96 4y agoIt's not as far fetched as you'd think. My understanding is that Wayland is a result of X11 developers going together to design a new protocol based on the thoughts and ideas they've had for an "X12" throughout the decades.
- throw009 4y ago[dead]