5 ms·
I totally agree but there are two differences: - WASM will be available even more places than the JVM - way more languages will target WASM than ever did the
by LeFantome 4y ago
I totally agree but there are two differences:
- WASM will be available even more places than the JVM
- way more languages will target WASM than ever did the JVM
Personally, I cannot wait for a WASM future.
Being able to target WASM for the 90% of apps that it is fast enough for and being able to use the same language and libraries to target native when required….is going to be awesome.
I really like the CLR. A more widely adopted version of something similar ( WASM ) is attractive.
- pjmlp 4y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_JVM_languages https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_JVM_languages https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Java_virtual_machines https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Java_virtual_machines https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_CLI_languages https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_CLI_languages And this ignoring all the bytecode environments that have existed since the 1960's.