Those radon numbers, however, are largely based on the same LNT calculations of risk criticized in this article. Most of the guidelines are based on questionabl

Those radon numbers, however, are largely based on the same LNT calculations of risk criticized in this article. Most of the guidelines are based on questionable epidemiology with very small sample sizes (when excluding the major confounder, smoking) and results in the typical 1.1-1.2 odds ratio for a relatively rare disease (in non-smokers, of course.)